Rubric for the individual reflectionΒΆ
Reflection |
None/ very weak |
Weak |
Sufficient |
Good |
Excellent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reflection on the process: cooperation in the team/planning |
Discussion only touches trivial or very general points of criticism. |
Student only identifies some possible weaknesses/strengths in the process which are in reality irrelevant or non-existent. |
Student indicates most weaknesses/strengths in the process. |
Student indicates most weaknesses/strengths in the process. Alternatives are provided. |
Student indicates all weaknesses/strengths in the process, and is also able to indicate which weaknesses/strengths affect the outcome most and how to address these in a future project. |
Reflection on the technical quality of the work |
Discussion only touches trivial or very general points of criticism. |
Student only identifies some possible weaknesses/strengths in results which are in reality irrelevant or non-existent. |
Student indicates most weaknesses/strengths in the results, but does not weigh their impact on the main results relative to each other. |
Student indicates most weaknesses/strengths in the results and process, and is able to prioritize them relative to each other. |
Student indicates all weaknesses/strengths in the results and is also able to indicate which affect the outcome of the research most. |
Self reflection: how did you perform: what personal characteristic would/should you improve? |
Student is unable to identify any points that could lead to personal improvement. |
Student only formulates some generic points of personal improvement. |
Student is able to provide personal points of improvement. |
Student is able to analyze objectively points of improvement for the process in which the student was involved and provides a plan for improvement. |
Student is able to analyze the full process in which the student was involved, derives improvements for a future project and formulate a plan for improvements. |