GEO5016 Workplace Supervisor Assessment Rubric
The professional-skills part of the internship assessment (30% of the mark) is assessed by the workplace supervisor, using the rubric below. Each item is scored on a scale from below 5 to 10.
| Mark per item | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1.1. Creative thinking and showing initiative | Did not contribute a new insight or idea. Only took minor steps after explicit request of supervisor. | Contributed a minor insight or idea, but only after being stimulated to do so. Showed some initiative for the proper progress and completion of the project. | Contributed a minor insight or idea which was implemented. Showed initiative for the proper progress and completion of the project. | Contributed a new insight or idea which was implemented. Showed a lot of initiative to ensure progress and completion of the project. | Contributed a new insight or idea that changed the original plan. Undertook steps outside original roadmap which turned out useful. | Contributed a new insight or idea that has an impact beyond the current task. Undertook major steps outside original roadmap which turned out very useful. |
| 1.2. Productivity | Has not made any significant contributions to the task/ project | Has made a minor contribution to the task/ project. Results need further elaboration and checking before being useful | Has contributed to the task/ project according to expectations. Results needed correction but were useful in the end | Has contributed to the task/ project with significant success. Only very minor corrections and checking needed | Performed the task with results above expectation | Solved a difficult task completely independently. On par with experienced staff in organization |
| 1.3. Independence | Can only perform the work with continuous steering and direct supervision | Needs very regular steering and supervision to perform the work | Performs the work mostly independently with regular steering and supervision | Can work independently with little steering or supervision | Needs no steering | Needs no steering and supervision. |
| 1.4. Motivation & enthusiasm / commitment & perseverance | Does not show any interest or motivation for the tasks given. Student escapes work and gives up regularly | Shows some interest and motivation but only for own tasks. Has given up once or twice | Showed motivation and enthusiasm for own tasks. Is distracted from work now and then | Is well motivated and shows interest in work of other team members | Is very well motivated and creates enthusiasm and motivation with other team members. Considers the work as her/his “own” project. | Is very well motivated and creates enthusiasm and motivation within the organization outside own team members or outside the organization. . |
| 1.5. Critical attitude | No critical attitude towards own performance and results. | Limited critical attitude towards own performance and results. | Sufficient critical attitude towards own performance and results, limited critical attitude towards information and specialists. | Sufficient critical attitude towards own performance and results, information and specialists. | Well-balanced critical attitude towards own performance and results, sufficient critical attitude towards information and specialists. | Well-balanced critical attitude towards own performance and results. Detects flaws in external information and corrects them. |
| 1.6. Handling supervisor's comments and development skills | Does not accept suggestions from the workplace supervisor. Prior knowledge and insights are insufficient, and student is not able to take appropriate actions to remedy this. | Needs the workplace supervisor to act as an instructor and/or needs supervisor to suggest solutions for problems. Shows some progress in adopting skills but also occasionally ignores suggestions of the workplace supervisor. | Incorporates some of the comments of the workplace supervisor but ignores feedback from others without arguments. Is able to adopt some skills as they are presented during supervision. | Incorporates most or all of the workplace supervisor's comments. Is able to adopt skills as they are presented during supervision and develops some skills independently as well | Weighs the workplace supervisor's comments. Is able to adopt new skills mostly independently and asks for feedback / assistance from team members if needed. | Critically weighs the workplace supervisor's comments. Has knowledge and insight on an academic level, i.e., explores solutions independently, increases skills and knowledge where necessary and asks for feedback / assistance from other staff members or students if needed. |
| 1.7. Interpersonal / Insight in functioning of workplace organization | Has difficulties functioning in a team or gives impression of apathy. Easily provokes conflicts | Has difficulties functioning in a team or gives impression of apathy. Is sometimes involved in conflicts | Has no difficulties functioning in a team. Adapted to the organizational working culture. | Is a good team player. Adapted quickly to the organizational working culture. | Is a very good team player / is an excellent sociable individualist. | Is a very good team player / is an exceptionally sociable individualist. |
| 1.8. Time management | Is not able to make a time schedule or comply to a (pre-set) time schedule. | Was able to make a time schedule and comply to it but the schedule was not realistic and/or performance should be improved | Was able to make a mostly realistic time schedule and comply to it but performance could be improved | Was able to make a realistic time schedule and comply to it. Minor adaptations to the time schedule were needed to allow for foreseeable circumstances. | Was able to make a realistic time schedule and comply to it. Minor adaptations to the time schedule were only needed to allow for unforeseeable circumstances. | Was able to make a very realistic time schedule and comply to it. The time schedule already allowed for unforeseeable circumstances. |